JTC1/SC22/WG5


Welcome to the official home of Fortran Standards


Overview of Fortran Standards | WG5 Projects | WG5 Email List | WG5 Electronic Document Archive | Standards and their Corrigenda | Officers | Future Meetings


Latest News

9 June 2010
Revision of the FDIS for Fortran 2008 The ISO Secretariat has requested some very minor changes to the Final Draft International Standard (FDIS) for Fortran 2008. The new version is N1830 and will be forwarded today. Details of the changes are in N1831.

David Muxworthy has provided three more pdf files pertaining to meetings in the 1980s. They are N025, N030, and N075.

Van Snyder has prompted me to copy electronic copies of the Fortran 66 standard, Military Standard 1753, which went with it, and the Fortran 77 standard, to this web site.

New documents since 6 May 2010: N1831 Responses to requests from ISO Secretariat (Cohen)
N1830 FDIS revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1826

6 May 2010
New documents since 21 April 2010:
N1829 Responses to FCD comments (Reid) - supersedes N1813
N1828 The new features of Fortran 2008 (Reid) - supersedes N1735

21 April 2010
The FDIS for Fortran 2008 is ready The Final Draft international Standard (FDIS) for Fortran 2008, N1826, is ready and will be sent to SC22 today. The Editor, Malcolm Cohen, made a draft, N1814, that included all the edits agreed at the meeting in February. This was checked by the whole of WG5 in an informal ballot, see N1825. A small number of very minor changes were suggested in the ballot or found subsequently. Details of these further changes are in N1827 and have been checked by John Reid, Dan Nagle, and Van Snyder.

Meanwhile, David Muxworthy has produced a corrigendum for Fortran 2003, N1823, that contains all the edits in Corrigenda 1 to 5. While this in not an official document, it has been checked by John Reid and Stan Whitlock.

Also, John Reid has revised his unofficial summary of the coarray features, see N1824.

New documents since 15 March 2010: N1827 Editor's report on WG5 pre-DIS ballot (Cohen)
N1826 FDIS revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen)
N1825 Result of letter ballot on N1814 (Reid)
N1824 Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1787
N1823 Combined technical corrigenda 1 to 5 for Fortran 2003 (Muxworthy)

15 March 2010
New documents since 5 March 2010: N1822 Editor's report on N1814 production (Cohen)
N1821 WG5 letter ballot on N1814 (Reid)
N1814 Draft FDIS revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen)

5 March 2010
New documents since 26 February 2010: N1815 Technical Corrigendum 5 (Muxworthy)
N1810 Minutes of the Las Vegas 2010 meeting (Muxworthy)

26 February 2010
Finalization of Fortran 2008 The main business of the WG5 meeting in las Vegas, 15-19 February, was to review the comments from the SC22 ballot on the FCD draft of Fortran 2008, see N1802. to decide on changes and to prepare the Disposition of Comments document. Edits to the FCD were made to respond to all the comments except three from the UK (see below).

The final WG5 ballot on interpretations to Fortran 2003 was concluded just before the start of the meeting. All the comments were processed and corresponding edits to Fortran 2008 were made, as appropriate. A final corrigendum was prepared, which will be placed on the WG5 site soon. Further interpretation processing will be against Fortran 2008.

All the edits agreed will need to be made to the draft and checked. The ISO procedures allow no further editorial or technical changes so the standard is essentially complete. It is hoped that it will be published in August.

Three comments from the UK There were three comments from the UK that were not accepted by WG5. The first proposed a new project to define a compatible subset; here, opinion was divided but a majority of WG5 was opposed, mainly because progress is being made by vendors towards full implementation of Fortran 2003 and the construction of a subset would discourage this. The second proposed that coarrays be developed separately as an optional feature; this had already been discussed extensively by WG5, so was not discussed further. The third identified a defect re the arithmetic IF statement and suggested deleting it; WG5 was sympathetic to the idea of deletion, but felt that the change was not necessary and corrected the defect since this involved fewer changes.

TR on Further Interoperability with C Work on the new standard was largely completed by Wednesday morning of the WG5 meeting, which made time available to give attention to the draft TR on Further Interoperability with C, N1808, and prepare a paper on the objectives, see N1820. It was decided that the development body should be PL22.3 (J3), that a new email list for the work be set up, and that the schedule be delayed by 8 months to allow two meetings of PL22.3 to work on the details before submitting a DTR to SC22. It is hoped that the TR will be published by November 2011.

TR on Further Coarray Features Work has not yet started on the TR on further coarray features. It was decided that this work should follow one year behind with the aim of publication in November 2012.

Further revision of Fortran WG5 confirmed its decision at the previous meeting not to start consideration of plans for the revision of Fortran 2008 before June 2012.

New documents since 1 February 2010: N1820 C Interoperability Objectives (Maclaren/Long)
N1819 Dutch National Activity Report (van Waveren)
N1818 Reply to comments on interop TR ballot (Rasmussen)
N1817 OpenMP ARB Liaison Report (van Waveren)
N1816 Result of WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1813 Responses to FCD comments (Reid)
N1812 Strategic plans (Reid)
N1811 Resolutions of the Las Vegas 2010 meeting (Muxworthy)
N1809 Japan's National Activity Report (Takata)
N1808 Draft TR on "Further Interoperability of Fortran with C" (Long)
N1807 UK National Activity Report (Muxworthy)

1 February 2010
Final WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 2003 interpretations The final WG5 letter WG5 letter ballot on Fortran 2003 interpretations is a 14-day ballot and addresses the 28 interpretations contained in N1805. It a 14-day ballot in order that it is complete before the meeting in Las Vegas starts. The deadline is 0001 Las Vegas time on Monday, 15 February 2010.

New documents since 28 January 2010: N1806 WG5 letter ballot 7 on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1805 Fortran interpretations that have passed a J3 letter ballot (Whitlock)

28 January 2010
Result of the DTR ballot on Fortran 2008 The result of the ballot on the SC22 site has a document that was not on the UK version, which was used for the message of 18 January. An HTML version is visible as N1804 and says "This FCD has been approved. WG 5 is instructed to take the comments into consideration, prepare a disposition of comments text and provide a revised text for FDIS ballot."
Minutes of the 1982 and 1984 meetings David Muxworthy has supplied electronic versions of the minutes of the 1982 and 1984 meetings. Many thanks, David.

New documents since 18 January 2010: N1804 Result of ballot on Fortran FCD (ISO)
N055 Minutes of the Vienna Meeting, June 1982 (Martin)
N080 Minutes of the Geneva Meeting, April 1984 (Surdi)

18 January 2010
Result of the DTR ballot on Fortran 2008 The result of the DTR ballot on Fortran 2008 is 12-1-6. Details are in N1801. The UK voted "no" and three "yes" votes (USA, Japan, Canada) were accompanied by comments. The reasons for the UK "no" vote, together with the comments of USA, Japan, Canada and further comments from the UK, are contained in N1802. The US comments refer to documents on the J3 web site and the UK comments refer to N1803. In addition, editorial comments have been provided by the ISO Secretariat, see N1798. The comments in all these documents will be considered at the forthcoming WG5 meeting in Las Vegas, February 15-19.

New documents since 18 November 2009: N1803 UK document accompanying its ballot on Fortran FCD
N1802 Comments on Fortran FCD from the ballots
N1801 Summary of ballot on Fortran FCD (ISO)
N1799 WG23 (Vulnerabilities) DTR ballot, JTC 1 N9947 (Benito)
N1798 Comments from ISO secretariat on N1791 (Cook)

18 November 2009
New documents since 30 September 2009: N1797 SC7 commenting template (Reid)

30 September 2009
New documents since 9 September 2009: N1796 Las Vegas 2010 meeting: Local Arrangements (Snyder)
N1795 Las Vegas 2010 meeting: Announcement (Reid)
N1794 Las Vegas 2010 meeting: Preliminary Agenda (Reid)

9 September 2009
New documents since 27 August 2009: N1793 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 N4484. Netherlands Contribution on The Growth of Programming Language Standards (Wakker)
N1792 Convener's report from SC22 meeting (Reid)

27 August 2009
Final CD submitted to SC22 Secretariat The final Committee Draft of Fortran 2008 has been sent to the SC22 Secretariat for balloting. The ballot due date is 29 December 2009.

New documents since 5 August 2009: N1791.pdf Final CD revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1782

5 August 2009
New documents since 25 June 2009: N1790.doc N1790.html N1790.pdf Comments from ISO secretariat on N1782 (Cook)
N1789 WG5 Business Plan and Convener's Report for SC22 2009 Plenary (Reid)
N1788 Summary of voting on Technical Corrigendum 4 (Seitz)

25 June 2009
New documents since 15 June 2009: N1782 Draft revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1776

15 June 2009
New documents since 21 May 2009: N1787 Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1772

21 May 2009
New documents since 11 May 2009: N1786 Index of meetings (SD7) (Muxworthy) - supersedes N1725
N1785 Draft Technical Corrigendum 4 (Muxworthy) - supersedes N1775
N1784 Draft Corrigendum 4, as sent to SC22 (Muxworthy) - supersedes N1774
N1779 Minutes of the Las Vegas 2009 meeting (Muxworthy)

11 May 2009
May meeting of WG5 and J3 The May meeting of WG5 and J3 was mostly spent in J3 mode, correcting glitches in the draft Fortran 2008 standard and making editorial improvements. WG5 agreed to two very small technical changes:
  1. In an intrinsic assignment for a polymorphic variable, do not require the expression and variable to have the same rank.
  2. Allow more than one type-bound procedure to be specified in a PROCEDURE statement.

Because of the number of changes made to the draft, it was decided that one more J3 meeting should be devoted to polishing it. Since the amount of editorial corrections after the August meeting should be less, it is anticipated that the overall delay to the standard should be about 2 months rather than 3.

Some progress was made with the Technical Report on Further Interoperability, but a revised draft is not available yet, since priority has been given to Fortran 2008. The schedule for constructing a draft TR for submission to SC22 was altered to April 2010.

Two minor changes were noticed in the edits of Corrigendum 4, which is currently out for vote, see the US TAG's vote, N1783. It is hoped that other countries will agree with these changes and vote in the same way. This should allow the corrigendum to be corrected without a further vote before publication.

New documents since 26 March 2009: N1783 US TAG vote on Technical Corrigendum 4 (Snyder)
N1781 Strategic plans (Reid)
N1780 Japan's National Activity Report (Takata)
N1778 Resolutions of the Las Vegas 2009 meeting (Muxworthy)
N1777 UK National Activity Report (Muxworthy)

26 March 2009
Draft of Fortran 2008 for discussion at the May meeting A new draft for the Fortran 2008 standard is now available as N1776, superseding N1723, which was the draft made available last year for CD ballot. N1776 incorporates the changes agreed at the Tokyo meeting and specified in N1760.

N1776 is a very important document for the May meeting. WG5 needs to decide what minor changes are needed, given that the technical content was established at the Tokyo meeting, and whether to submit the resulting document for FCD ballot, as specified in the schedule in N1693.

New documents since 16 March 2009: N1776 Draft revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1723

16 March 2009
Corrigendum 4 sent to SC22 Following the February meeting of J3, the following minor editorial changes were made to the draft Corrigendum 4:
  1. F03/0098 [421:27]. Insert the new text after "default-initialized subcomponent" rather than after "Allocation".
  2. F03/0099 [415:27]. In the new text: "may" -> "might".

The corrigendum was sent to SC22 today in the form of N1773 and N1774. N1775 is final version of the copy with references to page and line numbers and to interpretation identifiers.

New documents since 12 February 2009: N1775 Draft Technical Corrigendum 4 (Muxworthy) - supersedes N1771
N1774 Draft Technical Corrigendum 4 (Muxworthy), as sent to SC22
N1773 Defect reports that led to Corrigendum 4 and responses to them (Whitlock)
N1772 Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1772
N1769 Las Vegas 2009 meeting: Local Arrangements (Snyder)

12 February 2009
New documents since 30 January 2009:
N1771 Draft Technical Corrigendum 4 (Muxworthy)

30 January 2009
New documents since 8 December 2008:
N1770 Result of WG5 letter ballot 6 on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1768 Las Vegas 2009 meeting: Announcement (Reid)
N1767 Las Vegas 2009 meeting: Preliminary Agenda (Reid)
N1766 Result of letter ballot on the technical content of N1761 (Reid)

8 December 2008
New documents since 26 November 2008:
N1765 WG5 letter ballot 6 on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1764 Fortran interpretations that have passed a J3 letter ballot (Whitlock)
N1762 Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1747
N1759 Minutes of the Tokyo 2008 meeting (Morgan)

26 November 2008
Joint meeting of WG5 and PL22.3, Tokyo, Japan, November 16-21
A joint meeting of WG5 and PL22.3 was held in Tokyo, Japan, November 16-21, 2008.

The main item of business was to consider the ballot comments on the draft revision ( N1723 ) of Fortran 2003 and decide on any technical changes to be made. WG5's responses to the comments are contained in N1760. The main changes were to add locks to the coarray feature, see PL22.3 paper 08-256r2. and to alter the treatment of volatile coarrays, see PL22.3 paper 08-297r1. A revised summary of the coarray feature is in preparation (to be N1762).

Concern was expressed over the schedule ( N1693 ) and it was decided to review this at the next meeting (May 2009).

There was not enough time to consider fully the technical content of the TR on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C, so a letter ballot of WG5 is being held, see N1763 and N1761.

New documents since 6 November 2008:
N1763 Letter ballot on the technical content of N1761 (Reid)
N1761 TR 29113: "Further Interoperability of Fortran with C" (Long)
N1760 Responses to CD comments (Reid)
N1758 Resolutions of the Tokyo 2008 meeting (Muxworthy)
N1757 UK National Activity Report (Muxworthy)
N1756 Some comments on the recent WG5 papers on coarrays (Bader)
N1746 Japan National Activity Report (Takata)

6 November 2008
New documents since 31 October 2008:
N1755 Request for new features from MPI Forum (Rasmussen)
N1754 Implementation Issues for Coarrays (Maclaren)
N1753 Atomic LOAD/STORE intrinsics instead of VOLATILE coarrays (Donev)
N1748 Clarifications of Coarray Memory Model (Maclaren and Donev)

31 October 2008
New documents since 14 October 2008:
N1752 Draft response to N1745 (VOLATILE coarrays) (Reid)
N1751 An Analysis of NOTE 8.38 (Maclaren)
N1749 VOLATILE Coarrays Break Existing Code (Maclaren)
N1747 Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - superseded by N1762

14 October 2008
New documents since 2 October 2008:
N1745 VOLATILE Coarrays (Maclaren for UK)
N1744 Coarrays and Memory Models (Maclaren for UK)
N1743 UK proposal for Gw and G0.d Formats (UK)

2 October 2008
Ballot processing and SC22 meeting
There are problems with the ballot summary, explained in N1742. In particular, the Convener is of the opinion that the US comments are not in a form that WG5 will able to use at its meeting in November. He therefore asked Van Snyder to construct a summary. This is available as N1741 and points to PL22.3 documents that explain the details. The problems were discussed at the SC22 meeting and a satisfactory resolution was achieved, see N1742.

New documents since 17 September 2008:
N1742 Convener's report from SC22 meeting (Reid)
N1741 Comments from US Member Body on CD 1539-1 (Snyder)

17 September 2008
Results of the ballots on Fortran 2008
There were formally two ballots on Fortran 2008, both closing on 31 August. The registration ballot votes, see N1739 were 9 for approval, 5 for abstention (Denmark, France, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine), and 1 (UK) for disapproval. The CD ballot votes, see N1740 were 8 for approval, 3 for abstention (France, Japan, Spain), 3 for approval with comments (Canada, Germany, USA) and 1 (UK) for disapproval. This means that the draft is registered with ITTF, which is a formal milestone. WG5 is required to provide a response to all the comments.

New documents since 8 September 2008:
N1740 Result of SC22 CD ballot on Fortran 2008 (Seitz)
N1739 Result of SC22 registration ballot on Fortran 2008 (Seitz)

8 September 2008
Corrigendum 3 approved The country votes on Corrigendum 3, see N1738 were 11 for approval, 5 for abstention, and none for disapproval. There were no comments. The corrigendum will be forwarded to ITTF for publication.

New documents since 21 July 2008:
N1738 Result of SC22 ballot on Corrigendum 3 (Seitz)
N1734 Tokyo 2008 meeting: Local Arrangements (Takata)

21 July 2008
New documents since 16 June 2008:
N1737 WG5 Business Plan and Convener's Report for SC22 (Reid)

16 June 2008
New documents since 27 May 2008:
N1736 Liaison report from IFIP WG 2.5 (Numerical Software) (Snyder)
N1735.pdf The new features of Fortran 2008 (Reid) - supersedes N1729
N1733 Tokyo 2008 meeting: Announcement (Reid)
N1732 Tokyo 2008 meeting: Preliminary Agenda (Reid)
David Muxworthy has provided electronic versions of the minutes and resolutions of the meetings between 1985 and 1994. The directory N1097-N1100 has been renamed as N101-N1100 and the files have been added.

27 May 2008
New documents since 19 May 2008:
N1729.pdf The new features of Fortran 2008 (Reid) - supersededed by N1735
David Muxworthy has provided electronic versions of the minutes and resolutions of the meetings between 1985 and 1994. The directory N1097-N1100 has been renamed as N101-N1100 and the files have been added.

19 May 2008
 The draft Corrigendum 3, N1727, and the document supporting it, N1728, have been checked by PL22.3. N1727 was accepted and some very minor changes were suggested for N1728 to bring the edits there into line with those in N1727. The new document is N1730. This and the version of the corrigendum that does not have references to page numbers and interpretations, N1731, were sent to SC22 today.
New documents since 9 May 2008:
N1731.pdf Draft Technical Corrigendum 3, as sent to SC22 (Muxworthy)
N1730 Defect reports that led to Corrigendum 3 and responses to them (Whitlock) - supersedes N1728.

9 May 2008
New documents since 10 April 2008:
N1728 Defect reports that led to Corrigendum 3 and responses to them (Whitlock)
N1727.pdf Draft Technical Corrigendum 3 (Muxworthy)

10 April 2008
New documents since 20 March 2008:
N1726 Result of the interpretations ballot 5, N1722 (Reid)
N1725.pdf Index of meetings (SD7) (Muxworthy) - supersedes N1606
SD1 Complete Document Register (titles of papers prior to N303 provided by David Muxworthy)

20 March 2008
Committee Draft of Fortran 2008 starts its ballot
The first Committee Draft of Fortran 2008 is visible as N1723.pdf and has started its CD ballot, see ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC22 N4319. The ballot ends on 31 August. This is longer than the usual ballot period and has been chosen to allow the US comments to be considered at the August meeting of PL22.3. Please, everyone, look at this and send your comments to your national body.

Summaries of new material in Fortran 2008
Following the revisions at the February meeting, John Reid has revised his summary of coarrays, see N1724.pdf. He is planning also to write a summary of the rest of Fortran 2008, but this is not written yet.

New documents since 7 March 2008:
N1724.pdf Coarrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1697
N1723.pdf CD revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1718

7 March 2008
New documents since 19 February 2008:
N1722 WG5 letter ballot 5 on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1721 Result of the interpretations ballot 4, N1711 (Reid)
N1720.pdf List of hotels in Tokyo near the meeting place (Takata)
N1717 Minutes of the London 2007 meeting (Morgan) - supersedes N1691
N1715 Minutes of the Las Vegas 2008 meeting (Morgan)

19 February 2008
Joint meeting of WG5 and PL22.3, Las Vegas, USA, February 10-15
A joint meeting of WG5 and PL22.3 was held in Las Vegas, USA, February 10-15 2008.

The main item of business was to review the current working draft for the next revision of Part 1 of the Fortran Standard, see N1705.pdf N1705.ps.gz

Following the abstentions at the London 2007 meeting by Canada, Japan, and UK on the content of the draft revisions, the positions of these countries was considered in the hope of reaching consensus.

The delegation of Canada, see N1712, wished to reduce the size of the revision by limiting the co-rank of co-arrays to one and removing all parallel input/output. Handling co-arrays of co-rank greater than one was seen as useful in applications while not being a big implementation burden, so this was not accepted. On the other hand, parallel input/output was seen as untested and worthy of further study.

The delegation of UK, see N1710, suggested that co-arrays be moved to Technical Report and the delegation of Japan, see N1706 suggested that co-arrays be moved to another part of the standard. Neither of these ideas was acceptable to many delegates because it reduces the emphasis on co-arrays.

On the third day of the meeting, a compromise proposed by USA was found acceptable to most delegates. It is to separate parallel programming features into a "core" set that remain in Fortram 2008 while the following features are moved into a separate Technical Report on "Enhanced Parallel Computing Facilities".

  1. The collective intrinsic subroutines.
  2. Teams and features that require teams.
  3. The NOTIFY and QUERY statements.
  4. File connected on more than one image, except for the files preconnected to the units specified by OUTPUT_UNIT and ERROR_UNIT.

The technical changes needed to implement this were agreed. The draft will be available for public comment from mid March to the end of August.

The editor suggested that hyphens be removed from the words "co-array", "co-rank", etc. to conform better with the style of the document. It was pointed out that mathematics already contains similar words, e.g. "cosine" and "cotangent". The change was accepted.

The meeting made good progress on interpretations. One set of interpretations is already being voted by WG5. Another set has just completed its PL22.3 ballot and will be voted by WG5 soon. A new corrigendum will be sent to ISO no later than June.

19 February 2008
New documents since 6 February 2008:
N1719 Timetable for public consultation (Reid)
N1718.pdf N1718.ps.gz Draft revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - supersedes N1705
N1716 USA National Activity Report (Snyder)
N1714 Resolutions of the Las Vegas 2008 meeting (Muxworthy)

6 February 2008
New documents since 31 January 2008:
N1713 Canada National Activity Report (Xia)
N1707 UK National Activity Report (Muxworthy)
N1706 Japan National Activity Report (Takata)

31 January 2008
New documents since 23 January 2008:
N1712 Reducing the extent of the co-array feature (Xia and Reid)
N1711 WG5 letter ballot 4 on Fortran 2003 interpretations (Reid)
N1710 Moving the co-array feature into a TR (Muxworthy and Reid)
N1709.pdf Draft revision of the Fortran Standard without co-arrays (Cohen)

23 January 2008
New documents since 10 October 2007:
N1708.pdf N1708.ps.gz Co-arrays in the next Fortran Standard (Reid) - supersedes N1697
N1705.pdf N1705.ps.gz Draft revision of the Fortran Standard (Cohen) - superseded by N1718
N1704 Las Vegas 2008 meeting: Local Arrangements (Xia) - supersedes N1698

This set of pages on the World Wide Web is produced and maintained by JTC1/SC22/WG5 in order to inform any interested parties about the development of the Fortran language. It contains a summary of the present state of standardization of Fortran and of current developments which will, in due course, lead to further extensions to the language, as well as a brief history of the standardization of the Fortran language and the names of the key individuals and organisations involved:


WG5 Projects

WG5 currently has one major project allocated to it by SC22:

    Maintenance and revision of Part 1 of the Fortran Standard (base language), ISO/IEC 1539-1:2004(E), informally known as Fortran 2003.

In addition, WG5 is responsible for two other published Standards and two Technical Reports:

    Part 2 of the Fortran Standard (varying length strings), ISO/IEC 1539-2 : 2000(E)

    Part 3 of the Fortran Standard (conditional compilation), ISO/IEC 1539-3 : 1998

    Technical Report (Type 2) on Enhanced Module Facilities, ISO/IEC TR 19767 : 2005(E), see N1602

    Technical Report (Type 2) on Further Interoperability of Fortran with C, ISO/IEC TR 29113. Work in progress.


Future WG5 Meetings

    2011 (Joint meeting with PL22.3) June 27 to July 1, Garching, Germany (probably).
    2012 (Joint meeting with PL22.3) June (probably), Markham, Ontario, Canada.
    2013 (Joint meeting with PL22.3) June or July, Delft or London.


Some Other Useful Pages

Other useful information relating to the Standardization process can be found on the following pages:


Acknowledgement

The Convenor would like to thank The Numerical Algorithms Group for generously hosting this web site and the WG5 Electronic Document Archive.


Comments on this page should be sent by email to the WebMaster, John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk.

2010-3-15